The Effects of Calcium Silicate- and Calcium Hydroxide-based Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the postoperative pain level changes resulting from using calcium silicate- (EndoSeal MTA) and calcium hydroxide-based (Sealapex) root canal sealers in mandibular first and second molar teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with symptomatic apical periodontitis in their lower molar teeth were randomly allocated into 2 groups according to sealer type (n = 30). Demographic data, including gender, age, and smoking habit, and preoperative pain measures were recorded. Root canal treatments were performed in a single visit. Postoperative pain measurements and analgesic intake were measured at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and after 3, 5, and 7 days using the visual analog scale. The data were statistically analyzed using a chi-squared test (to compare gender, age, smoking habit, analgesic intake, and sealer extrusion), the Mann-Whitney U test (to compare pain levels), Friedman tests (for the evaluations of the reduction in pain levels over time), and Spearman's correlation test (to analyze the relationships of age, gender, smoking habit factors with postoperative pain) (P = .05). RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the groups in postoperative pain and analgesic intake at any of the time intervals evaluated (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with calcium silicate- and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers experienced similar postoperative pain and no statistically significant differences were observed in analgesic intake.

Association Between Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms in Candidate Genes and Success of Pulpal Anesthesia after Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to investigate the possible association between the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the SCN9A, SCN10A, SCN11A, OPRM1, and COMT genes and the success rate of pulpal anesthesia after inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). METHODS: A total of 70 patients (45 females and 25 males) presenting mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were included. Saliva samples were collected from the participants before the application of IANB. A standard IANB was performed with 1.8 mL 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Endodontic treatment was initiated 15 minutes after injection, and the patients were asked to report their pain level during the procedure on a 170-mm Heft-Parker visual analog scale. If the patient recorded a pain level of lower than 54 on the visual analog scale (no pain or mild pain), the anesthesia was considered successful. The DNA isolation and genotyping were performed, and the association between rs4286289, rs6746030, rs6795970, rs6801957, rs11709492, rs1799971, rs1799973, rs4680, rs6269, rs4633, and rs740603 SNPs and the success rate of anesthesia was investigated. RESULTS: The anesthesia success rate was significantly lower for the GG genotypes (45%) than the GA and AA genotypes (90%) for rs6795970 in the SCN10A gene. Additionally, the A allele for rs6795970 and the T allele for rs6801957 in the SCN10A gene were significantly associated with higher anesthesia success rates. CONCLUSIONS: SNPs in the SCN10A gene affect the success rate of pulpal anesthesia after IANB.

The efficiency of different irrigation activation techniques in the removal of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer from artificially created groove.

This study evaluated the removal of a calcium silicate-based sealer (EndoSeal MTA) with needle irrigation (NI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), XP-endo Finisher (XPF) and EDDY. A total of 56 human mandibular premolars were instrumented up to size 40.04 taper. The roots were separated longitudinally, and grooves were prepared with an ultrasonic tip at one-half of each root canal. The grooves were covered with EndoSeal MTA and re-attached roots were investigated based on the activation techniques applied. The results showed that significantly more material (p < 0.05) was removed in the EDDY group compared to the NI, PUI and XPF groups in the apical region. In the coronal region, no significant difference was observed between EDDY, XPF and PUI (p > 0.05), whereas all the latter were significantly more effective than NI (p < 0.05). These findings show that the removal of EndoSeal MTA can be more effective with EDDY compared to XPF, PUI and NI in the apical region.

Comparative study of ProTaper gold, reciproc, and ProTaper universal for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the root canal transportation, centering ability, and instrumentation times with the ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), and ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial root canals of mandibular first molars with curvature angles of 35°-70° and radii of 2-6 mm were included in the study. Root canal instrumentation was performed up to F2 or R25. The instrumentation times were recorded. CBCT scanning was performed both pre- and post-instrumentation. Root canal transportation and the centering ratio were calculated for groups, and the data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and least significant difference post hoc tests for the instrumentation time, root canal transportation, and centering ratio at the 95% confidence level (P = 0.05). RESULTS: At 3, 5, and 7 mm levels, there was no significant difference in the root canal transportation and centering ratio among the groups (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between the Reciproc and ProTaper Universal groups in the instrumentation times (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Root canal transportation and the centering ratio with the ProTaper Gold were similar to those obtained with the ProTaper Universal and Reciproc.

Effect of instrument speed when used in reciprocating motion on root canal transportation and centering ability.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the root canal transportation, centering ability, and instrumentation times after root canal preparation using reciprocating motion at 300 rotations per minute (rpm) and 600 rpm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty mesial root canals of mandibular first molars with curvature angles of 35°-70° and radii of 2-6 mm were included in the study. Root canal instrumentation was performed using R25 according to the manufacturer's instructions at 300 rpm or 600 rpm (n = 10). Cone-beam computed tomography scanning was performed both pre- and post-instrumentation. Root canal transportation and the centering ratio were calculated for both the groups, and the data were analyzed using independent sample t-test for the instrumentation time, root canal transportation, and centering ratio at the 95% confidence level (P = 0.05). RESULTS: At the three levels (3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm), there were no significant differences in centering ratio between the groups (P > 0.05). At 3 mm, 600 rpm resulted in more transportation than 300 rpm. However, there were no significant differences in the root canal transportation between the groups at 5 mm and 7 mm levels (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: At the 3 mm level, 600 rpm resulted in more transportation than 300 rpm. However, centering ratio was similar at both 600 rpm and 300 rpm.

The Effect of Preoperative Administration of Antihistamine, Analgesic and Placebo on Postoperative Pain in Teeth with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of preoperative administration of an antihistamine, an analgesic, or a placebo on postoperative pain in maxillary molar teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis.Design: A randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Population: A total of 51 patients with moderate-to-severe maxillary molar tooth pain who have undergone a root canal treatment.Intervention: Preoperative administration of either an antihistamine or an analgesic.Control: Versus placeboOutcomes: Reduction in postoperative pain? The data were analyzed with chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant difference (LSD) post-hoc tests. RESULTS: At days 1 and 3, preoperative administration of the antihistamine and analgesic resulted in lower pain levels than the placebo. At days 5 and 7, however, while preoperative administration of the antihistamine still resulted in less pain than the placebo, there was no significant difference between the analgesic and placebo (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, the preoperative administration of an antihistamine can be beneficial in reducing the postoperative pain of endodontic treatments.